
Off the Grid: Life on the hills
“It’s where you can let your freak flag fly. If you are not insane, you will be.”
This 2007 documentary is about a community of people who are truly living “off the grid” and almost totally disconnected from society. It doesn’t depict a glamorous life.
The film first highlights the right-winged, drug-addicted, gun-toting hillbilly types, but there are also teenage runaways and peaceful hippies living within the community. Most of the people seem to be very anti-government (for the most part), though they still rely on government programs for food.
One person describes the area as, “… the world’s largest outdoor insane asylum, and rather than renegades, heroes, and unbridled individualists, we have drunks, drug addicts, gun nuts, paranoid survivalists, and, most frequently, mentally ill veterans suffering from extreme cases of post-traumatic stress disorder.” But due to the authenticity and naked honesty of these people the film was somehow absolutely engrossing , and surprisingly, not in a train wreck sort of way.
The greatest irony comes late in the documentary when there is a problem with a local group of kids who separated themselves from the community at large. These “Nowhere Kids” were stealing from people within the community. The community developed (or already had developed) a small government to decide on how best to handle the situation. They voted and decided to send up some of the “mothering” types to talk some sense into these troubled youths, which appeared to alleviate the situation.
If you have Netflix, this film is available to watch online. You can also watch it for free at a couple of other websites. Just Google “Off The Grid - Life on the Mesa online” (without the quotes).
Natural Gas Line Exploded
In September a PG&E natural gas line exploded in San Bruno, California, sending an initial blast 1,000 feet into the air, killing eight people, and injuring dozens. Reports vary regarding the number of homes destroyed—from 37 to 53 incinerated and another 100 damaged. PG&E has since released a list of its 100 most dangerous gas lines, lines they considered at risk for reasons ranging from corrosion to earthquake. The list, compiled before the accident, didn’t list the San Bruno line.
Clean Coal - The Oxymoron
Never has there been a better example of an oxymoron than clean coal. It’s surprising to find the following definition on Western Coal’s website and to realize it’s not a joke: “Clean Coal: Coal that has been sized, washed and dried in preparation for shipment to customers.”
Clean coal is the term used to describe technology that reduces CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that burn coal. But the catch phrase has exceeded this original meaning and is now used as a marketing tool for coal industry, a term used to divert national attention away from the fact that burning coal is responsible for acid rain and mercury contamination throughout American waterways.
How to Be Eco Friendly and Save Money Doing It!
Going Green Today - Review
I am not the typical consumer. I purchase all natural cleaning supplies, fluorescent light bulbs, used clothes, and energy efficient appliances. I limit my driving trips as much as possible. I recycle. I rarely eat processed food, and 90% of the food I do buy is fresh organic produce and locally grown whenever possible. In fact, even my businesses, Green Lifestyle Magazine and Organic Lifestyle Magazine, are online publications that use environmentally friendly hosting. As tree-hugging goes, I’m doing pretty well.
When Scott Ankeny, founder of Going Green Today, and I first spoke, I let him know I didn’t think there was much he could do for me. I figured reducing my carbon footprint anymore than I already had would be too expensive or not appropriate at this time. I told him I’d rather look at the program after I move and can afford to implement some alternative energy generators.
“Just try it. You’ll be surprised just how much you can do today,” he said. “Yeah, but, I’m the editor-in-chief of Green Lifestyle Magazine,“ I thought to myself. “How much am I really going to learn about being greener?” Fortunately, I did not say this out loud. I quickly learned that when it comes to going green, Scott is a lot smarter than I am. In fact, halfway through the conversation, I realized that Scott is a lot smarter than I am in a lot of ways.
Going Green Today is a beautiful website. More importantly, it works very well. It’s laid out well, and very professionally designed.
It starts with a lifestyle assessment survey which took me less than ten minutes. After this I was told how I could save money and significantly reduce my carbon footprint.
For $47, you get the program. The website states that you can reduce your carbon footprint by at least 35% and save up to $2,000 a year (from what I understand, you may save much more in many cases).
Was it worth it? Absolutely! I learned a lot. Some of the changes where a bit difficult to make, and some of the changes required some upfront money to implement, but there were many simple and free things anyone could do that had never occurred to me. In addition, there were some things I knew I should be doing, but hadn’t done yet. It helped that each step showed how just much I could reduce my carbon footprint.
This program got me to make so many of the changes I had been putting off or ignoring. I have not read a better book, or seen a better program for teaching someone how to live a more sustainable lifestyle with easy step- by- step instructions.
I am really very impressed with Going Green Today; $47 is such a small price to pay. And yes, I did save money in the long run. In fact, by my calculations, this investment paid for itself within two months.
Going Green Today also makes the perfect gift for anyone you know who is either trying to lead a greener lifestyle or, like me, thinks they are already as green as they can be.
Energy Star Certification
According to the EPA website, the following criteria are used to choose which products earn an Energy Star Certification:
• Product categories must contribute significant energy savings nationwide.
• Qualified products must deliver the features and performance demanded by consumers, in addition to increased energy efficiency.
• If the qualified product costs more than a conventional, less-efficient counterpart, purchasers will recover their investment in increased energy efficiency through utility bill savings within a reasonable period of time.
• Energy efficiency can be achieved through broadly available, non-proprietary technologies offered by more than one manufacturer.
• Product energy consumption and performance can be measured and verified with testing.
• Labeling would effectively differentiate products and be visible for purchasers.
Sounds reasonable, right? But this year the program jointly run by the Energy Department and the EPA came under attack after covert investigators from the Government Accountability Office proposed ludicrous products that received the seal of approval with no questions asked such as an air purifier that was a space heater with a feather duster and flypaper attached.


